Case Study G: Paljassaare-Pikakari - Revision history

Anca-roxana.strugariu: /* A.2 Summary of you landscape system analysis and your development Targets */

2020-03-19T13:51:14Z

A.2 Summary of you landscape system analysis and your development Targets

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:51, 19 March 2020
Line 139:		Line 139:
	</gallery>		</gallery>

	== A.2 Summary of you landscape system analysis and your development ~~Targets~~ ==		== A.2 Summary of you landscape system analysis and your development targets ==

	=== Summary of the DPSI framework ===		=== Summary of the DPSI framework ===

Helene.merelli: /* D. Process Reflection */

2019-05-31T06:59:30Z

D. Process Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:59, 31 May 2019
Line 545:		Line 545:
	= D. Process Reflection =		= D. Process Reflection =
	"We believe that the case study in general is a very good method and a useful tool. The structure of the course was good with the materials and the lectures and progressive, it helped us and strengthen our knowledge in spatial planning.		"We believe that the case study in general is a very good method and a useful tool. The structure of the course was good with the materials and the lectures and progressive, it helped us and strengthen our knowledge in spatial planning.
	We obtained many outcomes like the fact of ~~knowing and developing~~ methods for comprehensive planning process especially in the local level and how we came across many technical and practical municipal comprehensive planning.		We obtained many outcomes like the fact of learning how to develop methods for comprehensive planning process especially in the local level and how we came across many technical and practical municipal comprehensive planning.
	We encountered some limitations through the phases, one of the difficulties we faced is the fact that we have no locals in our group which we had some difficulties in understanding some Estonian documents, in addition the area was large (360 ha) and very complex because of the diversity of functions, the different kinds of landscapes (Harbor, natural area, industrial area, abandoned areas, beach, wetland…) and the fact that the study area was and is still changing and developing rapidly.		We encountered some limitations through the phases, one of the difficulties we faced is the fact that we have no locals in our group which we had some difficulties in understanding some Estonian documents, in addition the area was large (360 ha) and very complex because of the diversity of functions, the different kinds of landscapes (Harbor, natural area, industrial area, abandoned areas, beach, wetland…) and the fact that the study area was and is still changing and developing rapidly.
	It was interesting to work in a diverse group with different backgrounds, cultures and methods. It was beneficial in the work process and in the brain-storming. And for the next time we would try harder to get more feedback and more time for consultations."		It was interesting to work in a diverse group with different backgrounds, cultures and methods. It was beneficial in the work process and in the brain-storming. And for the next time we would try harder to get more feedback and more time for consultations."

Constance.criqui: /* D. Process Reflection */

2019-05-31T06:37:39Z

D. Process Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:37, 31 May 2019
Line 545:		Line 545:
	= D. Process Reflection =		= D. Process Reflection =
	"We believe that the case study in general is a very good method and a useful tool. The structure of the course was good with the materials and the lectures and progressive, it helped us and strengthen our knowledge in spatial planning.		"We believe that the case study in general is a very good method and a useful tool. The structure of the course was good with the materials and the lectures and progressive, it helped us and strengthen our knowledge in spatial planning.
	We ~~engaged~~ many outcomes like the fact of knowing and developing methods for comprehensive planning process especially in the local level and how we came across many technical and practical municipal comprehensive planning.		We obtained many outcomes like the fact of knowing and developing methods for comprehensive planning process especially in the local level and how we came across many technical and practical municipal comprehensive planning.
	We encountered some limitations through the phases, one of the difficulties we faced is the fact that we have no locals in our group which we had some difficulties in understanding some Estonian documents, in addition the area was large (360 ha) and very complex because of the diversity of functions, the different kinds of landscapes (Harbor, natural area, industrial area, abandoned areas, beach, wetland…) and the fact that the study area was and is still changing and developing rapidly.		We encountered some limitations through the phases, one of the difficulties we faced is the fact that we have no locals in our group which we had some difficulties in understanding some Estonian documents, in addition the area was large (360 ha) and very complex because of the diversity of functions, the different kinds of landscapes (Harbor, natural area, industrial area, abandoned areas, beach, wetland…) and the fact that the study area was and is still changing and developing rapidly.
	It was interesting to work in a diverse group with different backgrounds, cultures and methods. It was beneficial in the work process and in the brain-storming. And for the next time we would try harder to get more feedback and more time for consultations."		It was interesting to work in a diverse group with different backgrounds, cultures and methods. It was beneficial in the work process and in the brain-storming. And for the next time we would try harder to get more feedback and more time for consultations."

Constance.criqui: /* D. Process Reflection */

2019-05-30T18:00:52Z

D. Process Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 30 May 2019
Line 546:		Line 546:
	"We believe that the case study in general is a very good method and a useful tool. The structure of the course was good with the materials and the lectures and progressive, it helped us and strengthen our knowledge in spatial planning.		"We believe that the case study in general is a very good method and a useful tool. The structure of the course was good with the materials and the lectures and progressive, it helped us and strengthen our knowledge in spatial planning.
	We engaged many outcomes like the fact of knowing and developing methods for comprehensive planning process especially in the local level and how we came across many technical and practical municipal comprehensive planning.		We engaged many outcomes like the fact of knowing and developing methods for comprehensive planning process especially in the local level and how we came across many technical and practical municipal comprehensive planning.
	We encountered some limitations through the phases, one of the difficulties we faced is the fact that we have no locals in our group which we had some difficulties in understanding some Estonian documents, in addition the area was large (360 ha) and very complex because of the diversity of functions, the different kinds of landscapes (Harbor, ~~Nature~~ area, ~~Industrial~~ area, abandoned areas, ~~The~~ beach, ~~Wetland…~~) and the fact that the study area was and is still changing and developing rapidly.		We encountered some limitations through the phases, one of the difficulties we faced is the fact that we have no locals in our group which we had some difficulties in understanding some Estonian documents, in addition the area was large (360 ha) and very complex because of the diversity of functions, the different kinds of landscapes (Harbor, natural area, industrial area, abandoned areas, beach, wetland…) and the fact that the study area was and is still changing and developing rapidly.
	It was interesting to work in a diverse group with different backgrounds, cultures and methods. It was beneficial in the work process and in the brain-storming. And for the next time we would try harder to get more feedback and more time for consultations."		It was interesting to work in a diverse group with different backgrounds, cultures and methods. It was beneficial in the work process and in the brain-storming. And for the next time we would try harder to get more feedback and more time for consultations."

Constance.criqui: /* D. Process Reflection */

2019-05-30T17:57:54Z

D. Process Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 30 May 2019
Line 544:		Line 544:

	= D. Process Reflection =		= D. Process Reflection =
	"We believe that the case study in general is a very good method and a useful tool. The structure of the course was good with the materials and the lectures, it helped us and strengthen our knowledge in spatial planning.		"We believe that the case study in general is a very good method and a useful tool. The structure of the course was good with the materials and the lectures and progressive, it helped us and strengthen our knowledge in spatial planning.
	We engaged many outcomes like the fact of knowing and developing methods for comprehensive planning process especially in the local level and how we came across many technical and practical municipal comprehensive planning.		We engaged many outcomes like the fact of knowing and developing methods for comprehensive planning process especially in the local level and how we came across many technical and practical municipal comprehensive planning.
	We encountered some limitations through the phases, one of the difficulties we faced is the fact that we have no locals in our group which we had some difficulties in understanding some ~~Estonians~~ documents, in addition ~~how~~ the area was large (360 ha) and ~~has a lot of information so the study area is~~ very complex because of the ~~variation~~ of functions ~~and~~ the different kinds of landscapes (Harbor, Nature area, Industrial area, abandoned areas, The beach, Wetland…) so the study area was and still changing and developing rapidly.		We encountered some limitations through the phases, one of the difficulties we faced is the fact that we have no locals in our group which we had some difficulties in understanding some Estonian documents, in addition the area was large (360 ha) and very complex because of the diversity of functions, the different kinds of landscapes (Harbor, Nature area, Industrial area, abandoned areas, The beach, Wetland…) and the fact that the study area was and is still changing and developing rapidly.
	It was interesting to work in a diverse group with ~~such~~ different backgrounds and ~~how it~~ was beneficial in the work process and in the brain-storming. And for the next time we would try harder to get more feedback and more time for consultations."		It was interesting to work in a diverse group with different backgrounds, cultures and methods. It was beneficial in the work process and in the brain-storming. And for the next time we would try harder to get more feedback and more time for consultations."

Constance.criqui: /* D. Process Reflection */

2019-05-30T17:53:15Z

D. Process Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 30 May 2019
Line 544:		Line 544:

	= D. Process Reflection =		= D. Process Reflection =
	"We believe that the study in general ~~was~~ useful ~~and the~~ structure of the course was ~~very~~ good with the materials and the ~~great presentations~~, it helped us and strengthen our ~~background and profession~~ in spatial planning.		"We believe that the case study in general is a very good method and a useful tool. The structure of the course was good with the materials and the lectures, it helped us and strengthen our knowledge in spatial planning.
	We engaged many outcomes like the fact of knowing and developing methods for comprehensive planning process especially in the local level and how we came across many technical and practical municipal comprehensive planning.		We engaged many outcomes like the fact of knowing and developing methods for comprehensive planning process especially in the local level and how we came across many technical and practical municipal comprehensive planning.
	We encountered some limitations through the phases, one of the difficulties we faced is the fact that we have no locals in our group which we had some difficulties in understanding some Estonians documents, in addition how the area was large (360 ha) and has a lot of information so the study area is very complex because of the variation of functions and the different kinds of landscapes (Harbor, Nature area, Industrial area, abandoned areas, The beach, Wetland…) so the study area was and still changing and developing rapidly.		We encountered some limitations through the phases, one of the difficulties we faced is the fact that we have no locals in our group which we had some difficulties in understanding some Estonians documents, in addition how the area was large (360 ha) and has a lot of information so the study area is very complex because of the variation of functions and the different kinds of landscapes (Harbor, Nature area, Industrial area, abandoned areas, The beach, Wetland…) so the study area was and still changing and developing rapidly.

Mohamed.aty: /* D. Process Reflection */

2019-05-30T17:43:50Z

D. Process Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 30 May 2019
Line 544:		Line 544:

	= D. Process Reflection =		= D. Process Reflection =
	*''Reflect in ~~your intercultural~~ and ~~interdisciplinary team on~~ the outcomes of ~~your study''~~		"We believe that the study in general was useful and the structure of the course was very good with the materials and the great presentations, it helped us and strengthen our background and profession in spatial planning.
	*''Which limitations ~~were you facing?''~~		We engaged many outcomes like the fact of knowing and developing methods for comprehensive planning process especially in the local level and how we came across many technical and practical municipal comprehensive planning.
	*''What have ~~you learnt from each other?''~~		We encountered some limitations through the phases, one of the difficulties we faced is the fact that we have no locals in our group which we had some difficulties in understanding some Estonians documents, in addition how the area was large (360 ha) and has a lot of information so the study area is very complex because of the variation of functions and the different kinds of landscapes (Harbor, Nature area, Industrial area, abandoned areas, The beach, Wetland…) so the study area was and still changing and developing rapidly.
	*''What would ~~you do differently next~~ time~~?''~~		It was interesting to work in a diverse group with such different backgrounds and how it was beneficial in the work process and in the brain-storming. And for the next time we would try harder to get more feedback and more time for consultations."
	*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
	*''250 words text''

Constance.criqui: /* C.3 From Theory of Change to Implementation */

2019-05-30T12:35:41Z

C.3 From Theory of Change to Implementation

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:35, 30 May 2019
Line 516:		Line 516:
	*''Which resources are needed? On which assets can you build?''		*''Which resources are needed? On which assets can you build?''

	Project process requires the action of different stakeholders together. The general framework is given by supra parties such as the government (laws) and Natura 2000 (guidelines). In our case, Tallinn City has a leading role in establishing rules, but also as an actor in the process. Its allies are the investors and the real estate developers, they bring financial feasibility of the project. Also, the developers are responsible for the housing development part of the project on the east coast.		Project process requires the action of different stakeholders together. The general framework is given by supra parties such as the government (laws) and Natura 2000 (guidelines). In our case, Tallinn City has a leading role in establishing rules, but also as an actor in the process. Its allies are the investors and the real estate developers, they bring financial feasibility to the project. Also, the developers are responsible for the housing development part of the project on the east coast.
	But one category of stakeholders should not be forgotten: the influences. The public should participate and should be consulted at every step of the process. The preservation of the nature reserve is their priority.		But one category of stakeholders should not be forgotten: the influences. The public should participate and should be consulted at every step of the process. The preservation of the nature reserve is their priority.

Constance.criqui: /* C.2 Spatial Strategy and Transect */

2019-05-30T12:26:41Z

C.2 Spatial Strategy and Transect

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 30 May 2019
Line 500:		Line 500:

	<gallery caption=" " widths="300px" heights="200px" perrow="5">		<gallery caption=" " widths="300px" heights="200px" perrow="5">
	File:Parking_current.jpg\|''Current parking state''		File:Parking_current.jpg\|''Current parking state (grey, heat island, impervious, saturated)''
	File:Parking_project.jpg\|''Projected parking system''		File:Parking_project.jpg\|''Projected parking system (reduced car traffic)''
	File:Diagram_parking.jpg\|''Diagram of green parking concept''		File:Diagram_parking.jpg\|''Diagram of green parking concept (shadow, permeability of the surface)''
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Helene.merelli: /* C.2 Spatial Strategy and Transect */

2019-05-29T09:48:59Z

C.2 Spatial Strategy and Transect

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:48, 29 May 2019
Line 494:		Line 494:
	<gallery caption=" " widths="500px" heights="200px" perrow="1">		<gallery caption=" " widths="500px" heights="200px" perrow="1">
	File:Transect_1_Final_vrai_dernier_.jpg\|''East coast transect''		File:Transect_1_Final_vrai_dernier_.jpg\|''East coast transect''
	File:~~Transect_n2_v2~~.jpg\|''West coast transect''		File:Transect_2_Final_vrai_dernier.jpg\|''West coast transect''
	File:190523_Section_Street_01_.jpg\|''Detail of the main street''		File:190523_Section_Street_01_.jpg\|''Detail of the main street''
	File:190524_Section_Prommenade_.jpg\|''Sustainable housing with promenade''		File:190524_Section_Prommenade_.jpg\|''Sustainable housing with promenade''

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:48, 29 May 2019
Line 494:		Line 494:
	<gallery caption=" " widths="500px" heights="200px" perrow="1">		<gallery caption=" " widths="500px" heights="200px" perrow="1">
	File:Transect_1_Final_vrai_dernier_.jpg\|''East coast transect''		File:Transect_1_Final_vrai_dernier_.jpg\|''East coast transect''
	File:~~Transect_n2_v2~~.jpg\|''West coast transect''		File:Transect_2_Final_vrai_dernier.jpg\|''West coast transect''
	File:190523_Section_Street_01_.jpg\|''Detail of the main street''		File:190523_Section_Street_01_.jpg\|''Detail of the main street''
	File:190524_Section_Prommenade_.jpg\|''Sustainable housing with promenade''		File:190524_Section_Prommenade_.jpg\|''Sustainable housing with promenade''